Using blue light as a cell and it DNA RNA activator turned up in Karen Kingston's patent research on mRNA vaccines and related or optogenetics..Seems bit coincidental blue die which permeates to cell level would be pushed w this optogenetic blue lite tie in ie all light then turned to blue wave frequency enhancing agenda towards transhumanism perhaps?
ps.seratonin syndrome has 3 stages first two of which not fatal and experienced as part of the drug experience..final stage is flirting w death but my guess is even most of those survive from evidence and is confused in general overdose per different drug max till OD or it's part of perhaps majority of drug overdoses as partial or main component depending on other toxicitys of drug on question..
Another observation to notice right now is the people promoting it as healthy. A good many of them parachuted into the health movement during covidstan and are now standing on the sand mountain of MB. There are some others like Alex Jones and Mike Adams that have been in the health movement like a tick on a Moose’s ass. You decided what you will about why they’re pushing it too…
I’ve personally come to the conclusion that I’m not putting anything man made or synthetic on into my body… especially if it has petroleum or coal based roots. My overall point is MB is going to smoke out the fakes or people trying to make money in the “health” movement. This could be a good outcome IMO. I just pray 🙏 that more see that there is a better way.
Low dose, short-term or topical is usually ok. MB is a classic intern prank, turns your pee green. Very effective antimicrobial topically in conjunction with red light, makes singlet oxygen which is crazy reactive, used against infections of tropical fish without killing them. Also cleans the tank, it's the blue stuff in long-lasting toilet bowl cleaner tablets.
Hear me out. There are people promoting new things on the internet all the time. Some profess to be trained some are influencers others are scammers
Some of us have been around long enough to do a bit of personal research and find out what works & what doesn’t. We also have instinct (if it sounds too good to be true it isn’t and all that). I have been studying alternative health on and off for 20 years. Originally for myself, then with becoming a practitioner in mind, then back to just for myself (and family) I don’t claim to know much but I read, check, verify and read some more, then I test things out in my own way.
I have also learnt that in the truther/alt movement, there are people who say something is great and immediately someone else surfaces with a “well researched” counter to disprove & discredit.
This is typical of the elite tactic to divide us all. We are all gullible at times, and I will be happy to admit I am at times. But I tend to sit back and look at things and tend not to react (immediately).
I’ve been on and off with MB for 2 years, then I started to see the anti MB articles and I doubted everything, but I sat back. Read some more, talked to a few people and have decided to keep it in my cupboard for such time as I feel I need it. I have several things like this. They are part of my journey.
Just because something is synthetic doesn’t make it useless/dangerous/a con etc.
Great job and thank you for caring, the good thing about this is seeing who lies, false information is lying. Dr Andy Kaufman recently came out citing real research, the same as you, and saying never take it.
I've read now the whole post, and watched the interview with Rachel.
I want to mention the issue of "depression." When people have depression they want a cure. They want a cure because they think it's a disease, and that's the entire problem: marketing.
A mood is not a disease. And a persistent bad mood is not a persistent disease.
That's it.
Medicine should be about disease. The transformation of a normal state of mind into the subject of research of medical science (is there even such thing as medical science?) was the cornerstone of the long political trend of dehumanizing human beings.
So, my first recommendation is to undo this spell.
Depression is nothing but a metaphor from geography, but in the flat earth there are no depressions: everything is flat. (drum roll)
But there is always a reason to be in that mood. The reason is different for each person. Through analysis of our own actions, we can learn the reason. Then, we are alone no more, for now there are two of us that are depressed: we and our reason.
More seriously now, what can we do? I recommend cocaine. I have never tried it myself, but several prime ministers in European nations are always super happy, driven, satisfied and focused on saving the planet from global warming. They are never depressed. That's our taxes at work. So, any person with a persistent bad mood should just start a political party, ask for money, and then go to amazon to buy White Power dust. That'll do the trick. And it's very safe because politicians never die. Best safety study ever.
So, there you have it. You just need money and power, folks.
Some kind of meth or amphetamine, ylene which seams to be a word used to make toxic things seam less harmful than they are, and blue, which is the most toxic of colors. “See blue glass toxicity”.
The fact that so many of the allegedly independent and alternative medias “with supposedly millions of subscribers”, are promoting it as something which should be good is also quite reveling, as it exposes their true agenda.
Regarding detox.
I advise you to ask an homeopath nurse or doctor about “Silicea” and “Thuja”, which taken in small quantities triggers your system into expel any toxin from your body.
Specially recommended for respiratory issue they work like magic for any type of intoxication.
Once again ask your homeopath for the type of dosage you need.
Well done exploration of this weird substance. Every time I encounter this substance in the "health freedom" community, and see people turning their tongues and lips blue, I wince. It is simply counterintuitive to me that blue dye of any type could be health promoting.
I just remember Methylene Blue as being a dye for staining slides of biological samples for viewing under a microscope. I would not imagine it to be a particularly healthful substance, given its affinity for particular cell structures which may not necessarily respond well to such artificial compounds in vivo.
I read that most of the dyes used for microscopy are toxic for living tissue. Which begs the question: how do we know that the structures seen under the microscope are the normal physiology of living tissues and cells, and produced by the slide preparation?
This is especially poignant in immunology, where little cells are supposed to go everywhere and wreak havoc for pathogens and healthy cells alike.
What if the granulocytes are misunderstood because of the use of dyes?
I mean to say, what if it is believed and taught that the cells of the immune system have certain properties that they don't really have, and that leads to say they do things they are not really doing?
Why are the microscopists so racist and prejudiced against little cells that done nuthin' to anybody?
Indeed. I tried and failed to find a late-1970s?-era black and white video I'd seen (possibly had originated as a film), made by a scientist who made some interesting arguments about cell models and the way different structures appeared under a microscope. What I mainly remember about it was his observation that structures that were supposed to be tubes, or elongated, were never shown to have oval cross-sections, as would occur in normal solid geometry. I desperately wish to find this video again. He raised a lot of basic common-sense questions. It's doubly frustrating for me, as I spent four years in undergrad biology and was taught all of this stuff as gospel. I would make the fetal-calf-serum broths, and I even extracted my own chromosomes. This was in the days before computer sequencing, though. It was all analog, with gel electrophoresis the main analytical tool for proteins.
Using blue light as a cell and it DNA RNA activator turned up in Karen Kingston's patent research on mRNA vaccines and related or optogenetics..Seems bit coincidental blue die which permeates to cell level would be pushed w this optogenetic blue lite tie in ie all light then turned to blue wave frequency enhancing agenda towards transhumanism perhaps?
ps.seratonin syndrome has 3 stages first two of which not fatal and experienced as part of the drug experience..final stage is flirting w death but my guess is even most of those survive from evidence and is confused in general overdose per different drug max till OD or it's part of perhaps majority of drug overdoses as partial or main component depending on other toxicitys of drug on question..
Another observation to notice right now is the people promoting it as healthy. A good many of them parachuted into the health movement during covidstan and are now standing on the sand mountain of MB. There are some others like Alex Jones and Mike Adams that have been in the health movement like a tick on a Moose’s ass. You decided what you will about why they’re pushing it too…
I’ve personally come to the conclusion that I’m not putting anything man made or synthetic on into my body… especially if it has petroleum or coal based roots. My overall point is MB is going to smoke out the fakes or people trying to make money in the “health” movement. This could be a good outcome IMO. I just pray 🙏 that more see that there is a better way.
Low dose, short-term or topical is usually ok. MB is a classic intern prank, turns your pee green. Very effective antimicrobial topically in conjunction with red light, makes singlet oxygen which is crazy reactive, used against infections of tropical fish without killing them. Also cleans the tank, it's the blue stuff in long-lasting toilet bowl cleaner tablets.
Next up… Vitamin D is rat poison.
Hear me out. There are people promoting new things on the internet all the time. Some profess to be trained some are influencers others are scammers
Some of us have been around long enough to do a bit of personal research and find out what works & what doesn’t. We also have instinct (if it sounds too good to be true it isn’t and all that). I have been studying alternative health on and off for 20 years. Originally for myself, then with becoming a practitioner in mind, then back to just for myself (and family) I don’t claim to know much but I read, check, verify and read some more, then I test things out in my own way.
I have also learnt that in the truther/alt movement, there are people who say something is great and immediately someone else surfaces with a “well researched” counter to disprove & discredit.
This is typical of the elite tactic to divide us all. We are all gullible at times, and I will be happy to admit I am at times. But I tend to sit back and look at things and tend not to react (immediately).
I’ve been on and off with MB for 2 years, then I started to see the anti MB articles and I doubted everything, but I sat back. Read some more, talked to a few people and have decided to keep it in my cupboard for such time as I feel I need it. I have several things like this. They are part of my journey.
Just because something is synthetic doesn’t make it useless/dangerous/a con etc.
The origin chemical history of MB Looks Pretty Bad, the results look miraculous.
Thank you Zowe!💐
Great job and thank you for caring, the good thing about this is seeing who lies, false information is lying. Dr Andy Kaufman recently came out citing real research, the same as you, and saying never take it.
I've read now the whole post, and watched the interview with Rachel.
I want to mention the issue of "depression." When people have depression they want a cure. They want a cure because they think it's a disease, and that's the entire problem: marketing.
A mood is not a disease. And a persistent bad mood is not a persistent disease.
That's it.
Medicine should be about disease. The transformation of a normal state of mind into the subject of research of medical science (is there even such thing as medical science?) was the cornerstone of the long political trend of dehumanizing human beings.
So, my first recommendation is to undo this spell.
Depression is nothing but a metaphor from geography, but in the flat earth there are no depressions: everything is flat. (drum roll)
Depression can range from mild, to moderate, to severe, to Robert Burton. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Burton
But there is always a reason to be in that mood. The reason is different for each person. Through analysis of our own actions, we can learn the reason. Then, we are alone no more, for now there are two of us that are depressed: we and our reason.
More seriously now, what can we do? I recommend cocaine. I have never tried it myself, but several prime ministers in European nations are always super happy, driven, satisfied and focused on saving the planet from global warming. They are never depressed. That's our taxes at work. So, any person with a persistent bad mood should just start a political party, ask for money, and then go to amazon to buy White Power dust. That'll do the trick. And it's very safe because politicians never die. Best safety study ever.
So, there you have it. You just need money and power, folks.
Just the name sounds toxic.
Some kind of meth or amphetamine, ylene which seams to be a word used to make toxic things seam less harmful than they are, and blue, which is the most toxic of colors. “See blue glass toxicity”.
The fact that so many of the allegedly independent and alternative medias “with supposedly millions of subscribers”, are promoting it as something which should be good is also quite reveling, as it exposes their true agenda.
Regarding detox.
I advise you to ask an homeopath nurse or doctor about “Silicea” and “Thuja”, which taken in small quantities triggers your system into expel any toxin from your body.
Specially recommended for respiratory issue they work like magic for any type of intoxication.
Once again ask your homeopath for the type of dosage you need.
Thank you for sharing Zowe.
Here is a "song," more or less: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68ugkg9RePc
catchy, huh?
The videoclip is the most important part of the song.
Also, anyone with G6PD cannot take MB as it causes haemolysis.
Thank you, Zowe, for these important warnings. I appreciate the resources you've gathered and shared.
Well done exploration of this weird substance. Every time I encounter this substance in the "health freedom" community, and see people turning their tongues and lips blue, I wince. It is simply counterintuitive to me that blue dye of any type could be health promoting.
I just remember Methylene Blue as being a dye for staining slides of biological samples for viewing under a microscope. I would not imagine it to be a particularly healthful substance, given its affinity for particular cell structures which may not necessarily respond well to such artificial compounds in vivo.
I'll wait for long-term studies.
I read that most of the dyes used for microscopy are toxic for living tissue. Which begs the question: how do we know that the structures seen under the microscope are the normal physiology of living tissues and cells, and produced by the slide preparation?
This is especially poignant in immunology, where little cells are supposed to go everywhere and wreak havoc for pathogens and healthy cells alike.
What if the granulocytes are misunderstood because of the use of dyes?
I mean to say, what if it is believed and taught that the cells of the immune system have certain properties that they don't really have, and that leads to say they do things they are not really doing?
Why are the microscopists so racist and prejudiced against little cells that done nuthin' to anybody?
Indeed. I tried and failed to find a late-1970s?-era black and white video I'd seen (possibly had originated as a film), made by a scientist who made some interesting arguments about cell models and the way different structures appeared under a microscope. What I mainly remember about it was his observation that structures that were supposed to be tubes, or elongated, were never shown to have oval cross-sections, as would occur in normal solid geometry. I desperately wish to find this video again. He raised a lot of basic common-sense questions. It's doubly frustrating for me, as I spent four years in undergrad biology and was taught all of this stuff as gospel. I would make the fetal-calf-serum broths, and I even extracted my own chromosomes. This was in the days before computer sequencing, though. It was all analog, with gel electrophoresis the main analytical tool for proteins.
I never consirded how dye could effect microbiology studies 🧐
More on Methylene Blue
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/methylene-blue-deaths-and-common
and
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/methylene-blue-toxicity-research
and
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/methylene-blue-deaths-understood
Thank you Geoff for all that you do to wake people up. Great Respect to You Sir, you are very much appreciated.
Kind Regards
It's confusing and when this happens, I look deeper.
I dislike when they do studies on rats using extreme doses.
It's misleading and shows that the study is trying to make a point with confusion.
Even the low 250mg/kg would be 17 grams to a 150 lb person. One drop is 0.05 g so to get 17 grams one would have to take 340 drops.
So basically, an insane dose, like drinking it from the bottle.
I don't take methylene blue because there are better alternatives for health but I'm not convinced that it's any worse than aspirin or any other drug.