Those of us who have been watching an ongoing genocide caused by mRNA shots have been waiting with baited breath in hopes that RFK jr, the new secretary of HHS will ban mRNA. It was strongly implied that the Covid mRNA vaccine, the most dangerous vaccine compared to all the others combined, would be banned immediately upon taking office. Further, it goes without saying it was expected that RFK jr address the childhood vaccination schedule. At long last, RFK jr announced that Covid vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. Far from banning them from the market entirely but it's a step in the right direction. Looks can be deceiving however, lets take a closer look behind the headlines.
Did you notice he said the Covid vaccine is no longer recommended for healthy pregnant women and healthy babies? It begs the question, why not everyone? Why only the healthy? Before I get into the gaping loopholes in the revised vaccine schedule, RFK jr also announced 17 members of the ACIP committee have been dismissed due to conflicts of interest. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is responsible for establishing the vaccination schedule, the advice becomes policy when approved by the CDC director. Here's the announcement:
We do need to repair the broken doctor patient relationship which was once sacred. We need to rebuild our faith in healers. RFK jr wants to restore our faith in public health by dismissing members of the ACIP committee at a very interesting time. You see, the revision for Covid vaccine recommendations was not instantly CDC policy as stated. There will be an ACIP meeting later this month in June 2025. Realistically there is little hope of replacing lost members of the ACIP before the meeting is held. Leaving the ultimate decision of revising or removing the Covid vaccine from the CDC schedule to the remaining ACIP members. It is 'standard of care' when there is a change in public policy to post in the federal register and before it gets enacted, there is usually a comment period. The meeting will be public and it is open for comment as I type, if you'd like to submit a comment the information is below.
SOURCE: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/06/09/2025-10432/meeting-of-the-advisory-committee-on-immunization-practices
Published ACIP Covid-19 vaccination policy has yet to catch up, at first glance it appears the policy was last updated December 18, 2024. It is followed by a very long list of the previous Covid recommendation changes. Click over to the immunization schedule and you will find it was last updated May 29, 2025.
https://www.cdc.gov/acip-recs/hcp/vaccine-specific/covid-19.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html
Adults are still recommended to get at least one dose, with an additional dose for those over age 65. Special notes appear to watch out for the unvaccinated whom lack documentation or evidence of immunity. However, no additional doses are recommended for healthy adults. It is only when you get to recommendations for the immunocompromised or special conditions that you discover additional doses are required. On the plus side pregnancy now has the distinction of "no guidance".
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html
Riddle me this, how does it help the immunocompromised to get additional shots which challenge their immune system? The intentional and diabolical nature of the psychopaths that devise vaccine policy becomes evident by conducting basic critical thinking. Of course the theory behind the vaccine recommendations is based on the assumption that Covid vaccines provide protection and immunity against Covid. I don't even need to cite references to prove that statement, it has been admitted on public record Covid vaccines do not provide immunity or protection against Covid. To recommend anyone get a shot that doesn't protect anyone from anything and has a net harm risk factor appears to be willfully harmful in my view.
If those with the weakest immune systems are targeted for additional jabs, what does it take for a Covid vaccine to be contraindicated? At the moment it is the only thing that would qualify someone for a medical exemption. The answer is one thing only, you must have an instant anaphalactic reaction! If you get myocarditis three weeks later, break out in hives, have full body inflammation (MIS-C, MIS-A) your doctor can still recommend the shot. Remember, it's your doctor that gets to do the risk/benefit analysis for you and if they decide the risk of Covid outweighs the risk of the vaccine, you should get the jab in their eyes.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-appendix.html
There is even a new loophole called "shared decision making" which get invoked in special situations for the severely immunocompromised. In the fine print it explains the various ways your doctor will try to coerce you into getting extra doses of the Covid vaccine yet somehow this is an improvement because there is allegedly no default to vaccination.
https://www.cdc.gov/acip/vaccine-recommendations/shared-clinical-decision-making.html
All this become increasing relevant as a brand new, next level version of Covid vaccines are hitting the market. This time, it might not be as easy as refusing vaccination. This wave of Covid jab has taken on the buzz word "replicon" vaccine for it's self-amplifying properties. The concept of self-spreading vaccines was the topic of a 2020 Euroscience open forum. The video was covered by The Last American Vagabond and it accurately depicts how everyone invisions self-ampifying vaccines to work. Let's watch
RFK jr claims to be working toward restoring the faith in public health while simultaneously approving the release of Covid Replicon vaccines that self amplify and remove the possibility of informed consent. Mind you, nobody gets full informed consent on a great many medical procedures. Anyone who has read chapter 5 of The Covid Code could tell you (or perhaps they have a story of their own). Likewise, nobody received informed consent on Covid vaccines to date. The pendulum continues to swing away from you being in control of what goes into your body and increasingly toward forced vaccination.
What is this new horror called a Replicon vaccine you ask? If you ask big pHarma and it's controlled regulatory talking heads they will tell you it is the newest medical miracle that will stop future pandemics in their tracks. Ask the residents of Japan, the first place it was approved, and they are likely to tell you it is the third atomic bomb! A serious claim people are not likely to ignore. Warnings about these new self amplifying vaccines are unavoidable but what makes them different than Covid mRNA shots that experts warned could turn people into vaccination factories back in 2020? The short answer is replicon mRNA vaccines don't just contain mRNA, they also contain a code for an enzyme that will make more mRNA inside the cell.
It is important to note the distinction between self-spreading shots and self-amplifying ones. There has been predictive programming for years now that vaccines would become self-spreading. As in one vaccinated person could vaccinate many others through touch, breath, or body fluids. We were told Covid mRNA shots would turn people into vaccination factories. Then booster shots were required more and more frequently because the mRNA allegedly wore off. These Replicon self-amplifying vaccines are supposed to last longer than the first generation Covid shots. In theory, boosters shouldn't be required as often or at all with this new method. saRNA is still delivered with a lipid-nanoparticle, just like the regular Covid mRNA shots which is a danger signal by itself. Additionally, the cell is being programmed to make a foreign protein that might be toxic and production of the protein might not be shut off. Spike protein by itself has been shown to be toxic. The saRNA is in replicon shots is made with a viral particle that is allegedly deactivated. This is the part that prompts scientists and researchers to issue warnings these replicon vaccines could turn people into vaccination factories and spread vaccines.
We were told a lot of things about Covid mRNA shots. They were only rushed to market because there was a global health emergency which was not true and continues to be used to bypass safety steps. The shot was supposed to stay in your arm but it doesn't. It was supposed to make you less likely to get Covid but it pretty much guarantees you will get Covid or a host of other conditions. It was also supposed to give you life long immunity and get society back to normal (pre-pandemic). There is absolutely no reason to trust them when they tell us how the replicon vaccines will work.
The front running manufacturer of this vaccine is Arcturus Therapeutics and it shouldn't surprise you it has the Gates Foundation grubby hands all over it. An investigation should be conducted on this company, it's financial backers, and partners. As luck, or misfortune has it, self amplifying vaccines have already been approved and experimental saRNA shots have been going into arms since 2021. For the time being, let's focus on investigating just how dangerous are these replicon vaccines?
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2024/10/inv-080712
Time is of the essence because there is a pipeline forming of self amplifying vaccines. It is not just a vaccine using yet another new technology. The technology that brought you Replicon shots is a platform poised to bring you more where that came from.
https://arcturusrx.com/mrna-medicines-pipeline
The first self amplifying shot, ARCT-021, is currently in clinical trials in America. I was only able to find 4 published studies and only the two that have been terminated have any results posted. Both studies claim they were not terminated due to safety or immunogenicty of the vaccine. Just as we found with the rushed clinical trials of the first gen Covid mRNA shots, the results of the trials are being downplayed to avoid negative press about how dangerous they already appear to be. Participants have suffered serious adverse events such as stroke, pulmonary embolism, clots, cancer, Atrial Fibrillation, gall bladder infection, and small bowel obstruction. It appears the most common adverse event is Covid after the shot and that is considered to be a minor adverse event rather than a sign the shot didn't work. There were no deaths but none of the enrollee's completed their planned number of shots. When people who believe in vaccines enough to volunteer for medical testing and those people refuse to complete their shots, that is all the warning I need to hear.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04728347?intr=ARCT-021&rank=1&tab=results
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04668339?intr=ARCT-021&rank=3&tab=results
There is a clinical trial in Vietnam that shows 16 deaths and 201 adverse events out of 1001 participants. The study claims, as they all do, that the replicon jab was well tolerated. Cases of Covid were identified using PCR testing and an adjudication process to confirm or deny the presence of Covid. Deaths during the trial were attributed to Covid after the shot. There were 21 deaths reported i phase 3b, 10 of those deaths were blamed on Covid. The rest occurred in the placebo group which was defined as sterile saline. It is not clear why there were so many adverse events listed for the placebo group in this study but it is very clear there are conflicts of interest. Researchers were full time employees of Arcturus Therapeutics and they were involved in the development of the ACRT-021 vaccine. It was co-funded by Vinbiocare Biotechnology Joint Stock Company who supervised the project. It's safe to assume the results of this study are bunk due to seriously biased shenanigans in their reporting.
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3329097/v1
One other study was conducted in Uganda and enrollees were required to use highly effective contraception during the study. Adherence to birth control protocols and regular pregnancy testing was built into the study. Could this new vaccine have an undisclosed anti-HCG enzyme in it that will render females infertile? The same warnings were issued for the first gen Covid mRNA shot and the movie "Infertility A Diabolical Agenda" will show you why. This will be something to watch like a hawk.
Results of this study may be the most revealing yet and the most concerning. A total of 64% of participants experienced systemic adverse events and 83% had localized adverse events after the first shot. Those numbers jump up to 85% systemic and 75% localized adverse events respectively after the 2nd shot. Last but not least, the strange blood disorder that I noticed after the rollout out of the first gen Covid mRNA shots makes it's ugly appearance right up front in the clinical trials of the Replicon jab. Blood disorders were thrombocytopenia, and two different kinds of white blood cell (thats your immune system) deficiencies.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/6/553
I'm not being mellowdramatic when I say this is bad guys, real bad.
One study compared the first gen Covid mRNA shot, Comernaty with ARCT-154. (it's the Vietnam Covid replicon jab). No deaths occured during the study but 94% of the ARCT-154 group had localized reactions and 64% had systemic reactions. There were only 7 severe events reported with most of them being in the Comirnaty group surprisingly.
Further reading on who is funding this replicon abomination and why are they imposing it on the populations of the world.
Get your copy of The COVID Code 📚 @
Thrill Kill Medical Cult.com
Psst it’s the only place to get author signed copies!
International sales got to| Ebay.
Chapters from The COVID Code with audio and mixed media you can’t get anywhere else! Exclusively for paid subs $5/month limited time only @ zowe.substack.com
Pick up your *merch* at the T-shirt shop by Big Frog Beaverton.
A freedom minded local business.
Website| Substack| Rumble| Odysee| Telegram | Twitter | T SHIRT SHOP
DONATE AT
KoFi | Buy Me a Coffee | & Zelle @thrillkillmedicalcult.com| VENMO @zowesmith1984
CASH, GOLD, & SILVER DONATIONS
You were meant to be free, but you have to claim it!
-Zowe Smith
Don't be distracted by the fake pseudoscience technology....
The shots are dangerous because of the ingredients. It's just like past vaccines, where adjuvants were the culprit.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein
As for the current administration, Kennedy and crew are playing defense for big pharma by slow dripping reveals and changes.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/not-for-sale-an-open-letter-to-hhs
Hi Zowe. I love your presentations. Very informative.
It's great that your banking "issue" is over, at least for now.
I wonder if it's the right time to stop worrying and love the bomb.
The replibomb jab. People gonna love it.
I like to tease interenet dwellers saying: at this point point we cannot know what is going to kill us first, the self-amplifying goo or self-assembling graphene parasites, but, on the bright side, we now are sure we are all gonna die, which is progress, and we should be thankful for dispeling that doubt.
Perhaps it goes too far. But if I say I don't believe in either invention directly people get upset. Dark humor is the only think that works these days.