17 Comments
User's avatar
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Don't be distracted by the fake pseudoscience technology....

The shots are dangerous because of the ingredients. It's just like past vaccines, where adjuvants were the culprit.

https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein

As for the current administration, Kennedy and crew are playing defense for big pharma by slow dripping reveals and changes.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/not-for-sale-an-open-letter-to-hhs

Expand full comment
agnt RogerW, on Holy Night's avatar

Hi Zowe. I love your presentations. Very informative.

It's great that your banking "issue" is over, at least for now.

I wonder if it's the right time to stop worrying and love the bomb.

The replibomb jab. People gonna love it.

I like to tease interenet dwellers saying: at this point point we cannot know what is going to kill us first, the self-amplifying goo or self-assembling graphene parasites, but, on the bright side, we now are sure we are all gonna die, which is progress, and we should be thankful for dispeling that doubt.

Perhaps it goes too far. But if I say I don't believe in either invention directly people get upset. Dark humor is the only think that works these days.

Expand full comment
GD's avatar
7dEdited

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices... same shit, different day. Why didn't they appoint at least ONE doctor that we trust?

Joseph Hibbeln former acting Chief at NIH--mobsters or the Good 'Ole Boys?

Martin Kulldorff formerly at Harvard (Trump is suing) and LEADING expert in VAX safety, really? And he served at the FDA.

Retsef Levi another vax safety expert--really, and he was on the Global Operations Program.

Robert Malone who MOST LIKELY sits on BOTH sides of the fence and whom Prof. Jay Couey blasts.

Cody Meissner HEAD of vax POLICY at a school of medicine. He had Advisory Role at the CDC and a voting member at the FDA.

James Pagano served on hospital committees (think of PROTOCOLS) and medical executive boards (nice agendas, eh?).

Vicky Pebsworth worked in healthcare for 45 years---think of VAX schedules that were never had long term studies. She was, or is, a RESEARCH Scientist for VAX SAFETY, really? And she was a former FDA member.

Michael Ross a university doctor, worked on PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY (thru COV???). He's on BIOHEALTH boards, but don't worry as he's committed to ADVANCING INNOVATION in immunology and PUBLIC HEALTH.

A dissapointment and pathetic. If I'm correct, time will tell eh?

I can't believe Robert Malone being on this committee; think about why he is everywhere and being so highly decorated by the military and experimentation.

Jay Couey should be on this Committee but he was fired by the Children's Health Defense for speaking out. He states:

Because the day that I got kicked out, I actually went... lab to lab. And I tried to find people that I thought trusted me because we'd worked together over the last four years.

I just said, „you understand that they are calling ‚transfection‘ an investigational vaccine and that they're encouraging old people to think about taking this. You understand that, right? This is the same stuff that That we do to our mice.“

And the point for me was that no one seemed to understand. And this frustrated me — and I think this story is relevant! Because for all of our experiments that we do on the bench, we always have to sacrifice the animal.

Sacrifice means: end the animal's life. So that you can do other parts of the study.

The shots are transfection disease and they were murdering people with the protocol.

I looked up transfection.

It has been proven that DNA is in the shots. DNA should never be in a vaccine.

2009 Infectious DNA Clones - https://virology.ws/2009/02/12/infectious-dna-clones/

The essential reagent is an infectious DNA clone, a double-stranded DNA copy of the viral genome carried in a bacterial plasmid. These DNAs (or RNAs produced from them) can be introduced into cells by transfection1 to produce infectious virus.

The infectious viral DNA clone is a double-edged sword. It enables manipulation of the viral genome at will, allowing unprecedented genetic analysis and the use of viruses as vectors for gene therapy. But nearly any virus can now be recovered from the nucleotide sequence – effectively making it impossible to ever truly eradicate a virus from the globe.

Transfection is now incorrectly used to describe the introduction of any DNA into cells.

Expand full comment
Un-silent's avatar

Call me crazy, but these shots sound a lot like the old ones., the shedding, the causing of sterility, and the possibility of severe reactions and death.

Expand full comment
Un-silent's avatar

I said shots not viruses. Is there something else you were trying to say?

Expand full comment
Eswar Krishnan, MD's avatar

Enjoyed reading your article

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

The Book ‘Medical Cult’ is fantastic!!

Expand full comment
Zowe's avatar

Thank-you, I especially love receiving comments like this from doctors. It renews my faith in humanity :)

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

Human interpreting PCR as a decoding device rather than an Amplifying device for further testing, was And Remains pure evil.

Expand full comment
GD's avatar

Wowzer start at 2:42:00 which Jay Couey explains what exactly the PCR tests were for and he explains they shifted from egg based vaccines to RNA platforms and will never stop as they plan on using this for everything. He’s saying they will say oh the reason why the vaccines didn’t work is because we put the wrong protein in it.

Other than that, the rollout showed that the vax’s were safe; other than that, they got sick because we put the wrong protein iN them…. Trust us again… sure

SOURCE: https://odysee.com/@Oisin.page:f/(2023-01-20)-PlanetWavesTV---Eric-F-Coppolino-interviews-Dr.-Jay-Couey:3

Prof. Jay Couey states:

No one has questioned PCR. The PCR test is the same kind of methodological tomfoolery that RNA virology engages in.

The idea that PCR can be used to find a signal is absolutely true.

Products are still being used, that are being used incorrectly to diagnose a background signal a RNA explanation.

people got sick in a very predictable way. And that was also called COVID, but it was actually just murder.

And so what occurred in America in 2020 and 2021, in Scotland and in other places, in care homes and in all kinds of different manifestations, was murder! And it was misconstrued as the manifestation of a “novel virus”.

PCR test used in the way it has been done without the necessary precautions to make sure that what was claimed to be measured was indeed measured and nothing else.

These brought us to a position where we now have a „new novel or innovative platform“ to immunize people against any pathogen. And the thing is very, very much,.. it should concern us very much.

This concept of intramuscular injection with the intent of augmenting anybody's immune system doesn't make sense.

Intramuscular injection of random or synthetic substances “to augment the immune system” is not only simplistic—it may be directly interfering with the core biological communication systems between our microbiome and mitochondria.

This interference isn't just a side effect. It may be fundamental to why we’re seeing widespread dysregulation of health in the wake of recent public health measures.

Expand full comment
lbrybor's avatar

Couey is a virus lie shiller.

Expand full comment
Redskelton's avatar

The global mafia has winners and losers predestined. You are looking down. Look up

Expand full comment
lbrybor's avatar

Hey Zowe, you know the DNA theory is just that: a theory, right?

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

And you know HIV was never proven to exist, right?

https://drsambailey.com/hiv-inserts-lies-lab-leaks/

Expand full comment
Rebecca Charles's avatar

After everything WHY is covid vaccine still available and the doctors that are giving it should be on www.deathbyhospitalprotocol.com

Expand full comment