According to the law doctors are not supposed to diagnose if an adverse event is associated with vaccine. They are just supposed to file the report in VAERS and the CDC/FDA determine if the event is associated with the recent vaccination.
According to the law doctors are not supposed to diagnose if an adverse event is associated with vaccine. They are just supposed to file the report in VAERS and the CDC/FDA determine if the event is associated with the recent vaccination.
Just because the doctors are doing it does mean it is legal. The 1986 Act requires a valid reporting system (VAERS was supposed to be that system but we all know it is anything but accurate) and doctors were not supposed to determine if an adverse event after a vaccination was caused by the vaccine. they are supposed to just report it and the CDC validates the report. Doctors know SQUAT about vaccines except how much they get in kick back money for adhering to the CDC schedule. The 1986 ACT IS LAW and there were many requirements under that law.
So you are referring to the Public Health Safety Act (which is the NVICP act by HRSA) There is a key difference. The act does not say physicians cannot diagnose a vaccine adverse event or document it as such. Physicians can even bill to insurance as adverse event and it is compliant. The ICD system would reflect those injury codes but CDC and WHO will not allow it to be used. Both agencies use that system almost exclusively for everything but vaccines. That is why ICAN is petitioning the ICD codes in the CDC's VSD database) https://secure.anedot.com/informed-consent-action-network/cdcpetition-vaccineinjury
What the 1986 act did was create a mandatory reporting system to VAERS (in addition to ICD) where they can verify and manipulate cases that get reported there. A "special master" can over-ride any lesser medical opinion for the purposes of compensation awards. It does not say physicians are not allowed to determine if they think an adverse event is due to vaccine in the clinical setting.
According to the law doctors are not supposed to diagnose if an adverse event is associated with vaccine. They are just supposed to file the report in VAERS and the CDC/FDA determine if the event is associated with the recent vaccination.
According to the law doctors are not supposed to diagnose if an adverse event is associated with vaccine. They are just supposed to file the report in VAERS and the CDC/FDA determine if the event is associated with the recent vaccination.
To which law are you referring?
I have personally witnessed physicians diagnosing and documenting vaccine adverse events, very rarely, but it does happen.
Or are you referring to the CDC's ACIP policy for VAERS reporting?
Just because the doctors are doing it does mean it is legal. The 1986 Act requires a valid reporting system (VAERS was supposed to be that system but we all know it is anything but accurate) and doctors were not supposed to determine if an adverse event after a vaccination was caused by the vaccine. they are supposed to just report it and the CDC validates the report. Doctors know SQUAT about vaccines except how much they get in kick back money for adhering to the CDC schedule. The 1986 ACT IS LAW and there were many requirements under that law.
So you are referring to the Public Health Safety Act (which is the NVICP act by HRSA) There is a key difference. The act does not say physicians cannot diagnose a vaccine adverse event or document it as such. Physicians can even bill to insurance as adverse event and it is compliant. The ICD system would reflect those injury codes but CDC and WHO will not allow it to be used. Both agencies use that system almost exclusively for everything but vaccines. That is why ICAN is petitioning the ICD codes in the CDC's VSD database) https://secure.anedot.com/informed-consent-action-network/cdcpetition-vaccineinjury
What the 1986 act did was create a mandatory reporting system to VAERS (in addition to ICD) where they can verify and manipulate cases that get reported there. A "special master" can over-ride any lesser medical opinion for the purposes of compensation awards. It does not say physicians are not allowed to determine if they think an adverse event is due to vaccine in the clinical setting.
https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/title-xxi-phs-vaccines-1517.pdf